|
As the popular saying
goes, what is important is not how things begin, but rather how
they end. The General Assembly of the International Paralympic
Committee (IPC), held in Sydney (Australia) last November is a
paradigmatic example of this assertion. Things could not have got
off to a worse start there; nonetheless, at the conclusion of the
Assembly, the results were generally understood to be truly
positive. The choice of the official headquarters, the profound
renovation of the Executive and, in general, the spirit of change
that pervaded this Assembly - even before it officially opened -
made it an encounter filled with meaningful content, tension and
hopeful conclusions. A truly new leaf in the history of the
sports movement for disabled persons.
As a prelude to the
Assembly, a meeting of the IPC Executive Committee was held in
the same city on November 4-5. From the very start, the election
of the new official headquarters was put on the table; this
initiative was taken at the previous Assembly meeting in Atlanta,
fruit of the maturing process undergone by the IPC and inspired
by the excellent results of the "IOC model".
 |
Since February 1997 there had
been six candidatures to provide the venue for these
headquarters (Oslo, Madrid, Paris, Ferney-Voltaire,
Colorado Springs and Bonn), whose different
characteristics and offers supposedly had to be studied
by an Evaluation Committee, which was then to report to
the Assembly and orientate them to make their final
decision. |
SYDNEY: A NEW
LEAF
IPC's General Assembly, held in the new
south wales capital, started off with confusion and authoritarian
attitudes and ended with consensus and optimism regarding the
future.
Bonn will be the new official headquarters for the IPC which has
renewed practically all its leadership posts, with the exception
of its president, Mr Steadward.
Evaluation versus imposition
Well, the Evaluation Committee - made up of Messrs Steadward
(IPC president), Bromann (1st vice-president), Lindström
(technical officer) and Michael Riding (medical officer,
substituting the treasurer, Mr Auberger, who it was felt should
not participate, given that he is French and Paris was one of the
candidates) - presented itself before the Executive with a
"closed view": Bonn had to be named the new
headquarters. Several members of the Committee then requested
alternative information on the other candidates, to no avail, and
- although the "recommendation" of the Evaluation
Committee was accepted by a majority - publicly expressed their
dissension, not as regards the contents of their
"advice" (the suitability of Bonn to house the future
IPC headquarters), but rather with the procedure adopted, which
they came to describe as "not very democratic".
One of the Executive members declared: "this approach
constitutes contempt for the General Assembly, offering it the
choice "Bonn - yes or no?". But, what about the other
candidates? Do they not even deserve some reflection as regards
their possible validity?"
Manipulation
The next day, November 6th, the IPC General Assembly was
officially opened with an optimistic intervention by the IOC
sports delegate, Gilbert Felli, who expressed the
"backing" of the International Olympic Committee to the
reform process of the IPC, particularly as regards the "normalisation"
of its relations with the different International Federations,
with special mention of the "Lausanne Agreement",
signed by the presidents of IPC and IBSA, with the support of Juan
A. Samaranch himself.
Nevertheless, such a promising start was to be immediately
disrupted as soon as the formal interventions of the Australian
authorities supporting this Assembly with their presence had
finished. Early on in the sessions proper, even before some of
the national representatives had been able to arrive in Sydney,
President Steadward proposed a modification of the Agenda,
namely introducing the election of the official headquarters as
the first point to be debated and voted. Many delegates - to
whose attention the unofficial "recommendation" of Bonn
had already come - were surprised, to say the least: was it
really so essential to vote on this matter as soon as possible?
If it was, why did the Presidency word the question in terms of
"either Bonn, or nothing", instead of analysing
extensively the different alternatives?
With such controversy in the air, the voting was pushed
forward and the president even declared that a decision against
his recommendation would be taken as "a vote of no
confidence".
Incongruities
The incongruities continued apace during this disheartening
start to the Assembly. In the initial count of voters, 92
delegations were accounted for (this figure later rising to 95
in the course of the meetings). Almost half of them had been
directly invited by the IPC, using the "Olympic solidarity
fund" of the IOC, nobody knowing what selection criteria
were employed and, of course, none of the International
Federations for Disabled Persons - such as IBSA - had been
consulted in any way. Despite the supposed importance of the
matter to be decided upon, the Presidency opted for a show of
hands, perhaps in the belief that its proposal would receive
overwhelming support. However, to fuel the fire of this
"conference of confusion", the result between those
supporting the motion in favour of Bonn and those against was
practically a draw. In addition, the headcount of the votes did
not correspond to the number of delegates supposedly present,
with the result that the vote had to be repeated and the Russian
representatives denounced the procedure adopted as
"illegal".
Given the president's defence of the use of a show of hands,
several delegates took the floor to express their indignation at
the irregularity of the process. This was the case of
representatives from Bolivia, Hungary, Italy, Dominican Republic,
Finland, Poland, Iran, etc. Philip Craven, Wheelchair
Basketball representative decided to formally challenge
the Presidency on this point of the Agenda relating to the
official headquarters. A vote was taken on this challenge, with
the 1st vice-president acting as moderator. The speakers were Fidel
Loayza, representative from Peru, who defended this challenge
to Steadward's approach and George Dunstan, member of the
IPC Executive, who argued against the motion, raising the idea
again that passing this motion could be interpreted as a "a
vote of no confidence" in the president. Despite all
this, the Assembly approved the challenge to the president, with 53
votes for, 38 against and 4 abstentions.
The session thus ended without the question of the official
headquarters being resolved, the decision being left for the
following day. At the request of Mr Steadward, the Executive held
an urgent meeting that night to attempt to sort out this issue.
At this meeting, Juan Palau, president of ISOD, suffered a
serious heart failure and had to be rushed to hospital.
The Committee decided to stick to its recommendation of Bonn,
but also to offer the Assembly information on the other two
options which, objectively, had a chance of becoming the future
headquarters: Paris and Madrid.
Road to hope opens up
Novebember 7th thus opened once again with a call for a spirit
of collaboration and goodwill amongst the delegates, this time
from the lips of the Austrian representative, Daniel Binter.
Wishing to continue this momentum, Miguel Sagarra (who
would later be elected as the new secretary general of the IPC)
took the floor and announced the withdrawal of the Madrid
candidature, with a view to smoothing out the problems. Both he
and the other delegates who had been quite belligerent with the
approach of the Presidency insisted, once again, that their
dissidence was not directed at the content of the stance (the
"quality" of the Bonn candidature, which could surely
be confirmed in an objective manner), but rather at "how"
the question had been presented before the Assembly members
as something "already decided", without permitting them
an adequate knowledge of the underlying factors or to decide in a
democratic fashion befitting an institution such as the IPC.
The conciliatory attitude of the Spanish delegates and their
resolute defence of the general interest, as opposed to any
individual stance, were applauded by the Assembly and produced a
radical change in the overall mood of the meeting. A request was
even made - and supported by overwhelming majority - for a vote
of confidence in the president, Robert Steadward, the Assembly
wishing to express its continued support, whilst demanding that
he reconsider the need to respect the democratic procedure
in the management of the sports movement for disabled persons.
Democratic lesson
The president of IBSA, Enrique Sanz, pointed out that
what had occurred in Sydney constituted a true "lesson in
democracy", and went on to highlight the positive effect
of the incorporation of new countries to the IPC, "some-
thing which enhances the debate with-in our organisation and
serves as a platform for extending the practice of sports by
disabled persons, not just - as was the case previously - in the
highly developed countries, but also in more deprived regions
such as Latin America". Indeed, throughout the sessions, the
weight of these new countries was consistently noted in the votes
taken at the Assembly, as were the quality and profound nature of
the speeches, interventions and debates. Most noteworthy were the
participation of several IBSA members, such as the chairman of
the American continent, the Argentinean Alberto Bravo.
In this context, we must recognise the demands of the sports
- and their true protagonists, the sportsmen and women -
as constituting the corner-
stone of the IPC. It has been made perfectly clear that
"what the athletes feel" must be ever present within
the decision-making bodies of the Committee, both as regards the
direction their actions take and the very composition of its
ruling bodies.
The makeup of the new Executive is a good example of
this line of action. The profound renovation undertaken -
affecting the posts of the new vice-presidents, secretary
general, technical officer, etc. - together with the re-election
of the president, Mr Steadward, permits us to look forward to
this "new leaf" within the organisation, not
according to criteria of continuity, as this must be for him too
a "new presidency", but rather with full
guarantees, offering the stability the groups of disabled
athletes require for their adequate development.
A new spirit
This new spirit is clearly evidenced in such significant
figures as the first vice-president York Chow, who chair-
ed the "Task Force", the commission formed to
effect an in-depth study of the problems and tensions existing
between the structures of the IPC and the International
Federations which, as is the case of IBSA, represent ath-
letes with particular disabilities. Its report, presented
before the IPC Assembly in Atlanta (1996), was praised for the balanced
nature of its analysis and the criterion of operativity as
regards the conclusions drawn from its contents. His presence
next to President Steadward constitutes - in itself - a true
guarantee of dialogue for all our groups, which have
expressed their conviction that they will not be disappointed
again in this respect.
The same can be said of the appointment of the North American
expert Carol Mushett as the new IPC technical officer. Her
highly-regarded professional career, principally linked to the
CP-ISRA Federation and - more recently - to the organisation of
the Paralympic Games in Atlanta, led to her appointment being
interpreted in Sydney as "the triumph of sport and the
athletes" within a ruling body of such importance. Her
proven willingness to exchange views, her direct knowledge of the
circumstances affect-
ing the running of competition events for the different
disabled groups and, in short, her clear commitment to "sport
above all" pave the way for optimism as regards a new
stage governed by the technical and competitive progress of our
sports.
As for the new secretary general, Miguel Sagarra, with
his intervention at the Assembly he has already demonstrated his
courage when it comes to overcoming obstacles and going all out
to seek solutions, instead of going round in circles needlessly
when dealing with conflicts. We include an interview with him in
this issue, in which he manifests his priority of "oiling
the machinery of the IPC", as well as consolidating the unity
and dialogue between the different groups represented
within it.
With these elements and the renewed confidence afforded him by
the international representatives of dis-
abled athletes, President Steadward finds himself with
a golden opportunity to arrive at the 2000 Paralympic Games with
a Paralympic Movement truly modernised and brimming over with
enthusiasm. IBSA, which at certain moments may have held
differences with some aspects of his management, wanted to be the
first to express these good wishes, place its trust in him and
offer its full support for the development of a new approach,
whose results will surely prove positive for all.
SYDNEY: A NEW LEAF
the IPC
For the president of IBSA, Enrique
Sanz, what happened in Sydney was a true "lesson in
democracy" and he highlighted the positive effect of the
incorporation of new countries to the IPC
 |
THE
TUNNEL AND THE LIGHT
It is sometimes necessary for
problems to "get really complicated" before
solutions can begin to be found. A series of tensions
have been generated within the IPC -ever since it started
out at the '92 Games- and have continued building up as
it has not known how to confront the combination of
problems, in many ways similar but with evident
peculiarities, of the different groups that go to make up
the Paralympic Movement. It was obviously not an easy
task -it must be said- but it is equally true that,
frequently, they opted for the least suitable methods of
seeking solutions and points in common.
The method chosen in Sydney for voting on the new IPC
headquarters is a particularly clear example of this
deterioration. These kinds of attitudes -which could be
interpreted as a half-way house between paternalism and
authoritarianism- are those that must not be repeated in
this new phase.
The delegates at the Assembly demonstrated with their
attitude the maturity, clarity and firmness of their
positions: IPC, as the representative management body of
this sporting sector, must act in a scrupulously
democratic fashion. Whilst the phantom of past errors was
once again present at the start of the Sydney meeting,
plunging us into the darkness of the tunnel, in the end
we saw the light that allows us to face the future with
justified hope.
|
THE BEST GAMES OF ALL TIME
Sydney played host to the IPC General Assembly
and took the opportunity to show all the delegates there present
(representing over 70 countries) the promising progress of
developments in the project for their year 2000 games. With a
model which the organisers themselves hope will be "close to
the running of Barcelona'92", those responsible for these
end-of-the-millennium paralympics are convinced they will be
"the best the word go -its full collaboration to ensure this
highly foreseeable success becomes a reality in two and a half
years" time, down under.
LINDSTRÖM RECTIFIES
The to-date IPC Technical Officer, and now its European
Regional President, Hans Lindström, has addressed our magazine
to rectify an aspect of the information which we offered in the
last issue of BSI with respect to events at the IBSA General
Assembly in Casablanca (MOrocco).
Our quote, taken from one of his interventions at said
assembly, which he attended as representative of Sweden, was as
follows:
"If IBSA proposes the incorporation of new sports, I am
going to defend it to the end before the Technical
Committee."
Mr Lindström now points out that what he really declared
before the assembly was:
"I propose that influence for IBSA in the SAEC's should
be secured, and I am prepared to defend this idea to the
end."
We regret any possible misunderstanding on the part of our
editorial staff (wich Mr Lindström may rest assured would never
wish to misinform its readers as to his true criteria concerning
these questions), undoubtedly due to problems arising from the
simultaneous translation into several languages of each of the
interventions. This rectification, however, was published at once
on IBSA's internet website.
In any case, we have clarified here exactly what
he wished to say before IBSA's General Assembly.
As we have been reporting throughout this
issue, the latest IPC General Assembly proved to be a positive,
important turning point in the internal operation of the ruling
body for international Paralympic sport. The new approach and the
good work of the institution are going to be in the hands of a
group of persons who will enjoy the full confidence of the IPC's
Executive and of its president. The innovation is the formation
of three vice-presidencies to cover such significant areas as
marketing, communications, planning, development, etc. These then
are all the president's men and women
.
"All the men and women of the IPC"
 |
PRESIDENTE: ROBERT DANIEL STEADWARD (Canada).
Date of birth: May 26th 1946.
Professor at the University of Alberta, Edmunton-Canada.
He has held several posts of responsibility within
different Paralympic sports associations in his country,
such as the Wheelchair Sports and Recreation Association
of Alberta (Canada), the Canadian Wheelchair Sports
Association, the Paralympic Sports Association or the
Canadian Paralympic Committee.
He has also received several awards for his work in
advancing disabled sports in his home country and has
been nominated for the 'Order of Canada'.
He has been president of the International Paralympic
Committee since 1989. |
 |
SECRETARY GENERAL: MIGUEL SAGARRA GADEA (Spain).
Date of birth: May 3rd 1954.
Graduate in Business Studies and Tourism.
Post-graduate course in Management and Administration of
non-profit-making organisations.
Currently Director of Cooperation and Sports within the
ONCE Foundation, and has ample experience in management
posts in the Spanish National Organisation for the Blind.
He is also secretary general of the Spanish Paralympic
Committee. |
Profile of those who will occupy positions of trust next to
ROBERT STEADWARD, at the helm of the International Paralympic
Committee "The sports delegate of the IOC,
Gilbert Felli, declared the support of the International Olympic
Committee to the process of reform within the IPC, especially as
regards the "normalisation of its relations with the
different International Federations"
 |
VICE-PRESIDENT FOR LIAISON WITH THE PARALYMPIC GAMES:
FRANCOIS TERRANOVA (France).
Date of birth: June 25th 1936.
He is currently inspector general in the French Ministry
of Youth and Sports Affairs. Almost all his professional
career has taken place within the French public
administration and he holds several distinctions such as
the 'Order of National Merit' or 'Knight of the French
Legion of Honour', awarded recently.
Finally, special mention must be given to his report,
prepared under the control of the IPC presidency, on the
question of IPC/UNESCO Cooperation, which led to the
posterior bilateral agreement. |
 |
VICE-PRESIDENT FOR POLICY, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.
DR YORK CHOW (Hong Kong-China). Date of birth: August 6th
1947.
He is an orthopaedic surgeon and executive director of
the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Hong Kong. He is also a
member of the Executive Committee of CP-ISRA and has an
extensive curriculum in management posts in several
Paralympic sports bodies and federations.
He confesses to being 'in love with sport' in the widest
sense of the term. |
VICEPRESIDENTE OF MARKETING & COMUNICACIÓN: DUNCAN ORN
WYETH (USA).
Date of birth: July 3rd 1946.
He is currently in charge of Customer Attention in the
Michigan Rehabilitation Services. Since birth, he has suffered
from cerebral palsy, something which has not impeded him from
practising sports and enjoying an extensive professional career.
He forms part of the United States Olympic Committee, where he is
one of the seven representatives of disabled athletes on this
Committee. Like Carol, he has published numerous articles and
held different management posts in institutions related to the
disabled sector.
THINKING ABOUT THE GAMES
Holding the IPC General Assembly in Sydney offered the
delegates an opportunity to observe first-hand the preparations
for the Paralympics, to be held in this australian city in the
year 2000. The President of IBSA, Enrique Sanz, met up -in the
offices of the spoc (Paralympics Games Organising Committee)-
with is ceo, Lois Appleby, together with Louise Walsh, head of
Marketing, and Jane West, director of Communications.
On the request of the australian representatives, our
president outlined his direct contribution towards the promotion
of the '92 Barcelona paralympic Games, as head of public
relations and publicity for the Spanish Blind Organisation
(ONCE), a key factor in ensuring the success of this event. He
also offered the SPOC several promotional videos of the IBSA
Federation, wich were received with great interest given their
innovative nature in this sector.
TECHNICAL OFFICER: CAROL ADAMS MUSHETT (USA).
Date of birth: July 2nd 1954.
Member of the United States Olympic Committee and technical
officer of CP-ISRA.
She is currently working at the State University of Georgia, in
the Department of Kinesiology and Health.
She has published books and manuals on this medical speciality,
as well as many articles in prestigious specialised medical
journals.
|
 |